OCC
Revisits Bank Owned Life Insurance
by: Brian
W. Smith, Mayer
Brown & Platt, August/September 2000
On July 20, 2000, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC")
rescinded OCC Bulletin BC 96-51 and replaced
it with OCC Bulletin OCC 2000-23. While
substantially the same as 96-51, Bulletin
OCC 2000-23 includes some new provisions
which are important for banks of all types
to focus on if they are considering a
purchase of bank owned life insurance (BOLI).
BOLI is the term coined to describe all life
insurance that a bank purchases and either
owns or in which it has a beneficial
interest. For several years, banks have been
purchasing substantial amounts of life
insurance on the lives of their directors,
officers and employees for which the banks
are the owners and beneficiaries of the
policies. These policies have been typically
tied to the bank recovering (through the
policy proceeds) all or a part of the costs
of the bank’s employee compensation and
benefit plans.
OCC Bulletin 2000-23 in two important
respects revises the language of 96-51 as it
relates to the legal authority of a bank to
purchase BOLI. First, 2000-23 enumerates
four situations which have been found
incidental to banking and therefore
permissible for banks: key person insurance,
insurance on borrowers, insurance purchases
in connection with employee compensation and
benefit plans, and insurance taken as
security for loans. 2000-23 carefully
departs from 96-51 by affirming that:
"The OCC may approve other uses
of bank-owned life insurance on a case by
case basis" (emphasis added). In
other words, absent a specific OCC
determination of permissibility, BOLI may
not be purchased for any reason other than
those listed.
A second way in which 2000-23 differs from
96-51 is that it provides an explicit
confirmation that banks may purchase
separate account insurance products that
hold equity securities for the purpose of
hedging their obligations under employee
compensation and benefit plans. The OCC
warns that if the insurance cannot be
properly characterized as an effective
hedging transaction, the presence of equity
securities in the separate account is
impermissible.
The OCC further advises that a bank
considering a separate account:
1.
Analyze and document the correlation
between the insured liability and the
equity securities (held in the separate
account).
2.
Determine a target hedge effectiveness
ratio and establish a method to alter
the program if the hedge effectiveness
drops.
3.
Establish a process for analyzing and
reporting the effect of the hedge on the
bank’s income statement and capital
ratios.
Conclusion
2000-23 is useful in that it: (a) reinforces
the legitimacy of BOLI after so many years
and so many banks purchasing these products;
and (b) clarifies the limited permissibility
of purchasing equity securities in a
separate account.
Banks should be advised, however, that
2000-23 did not in any way lessen the need
for meaningful prepurchase risk
analysis and judicious evaluation of the
proper size and structure of the insurance
purchase.
by:
Brian
W. Smith, Mayer
Brown & Platt, August/September 2000
Disclaimer: The materials contained in Securitization.Net™ have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal or professional advice. This information has been provided by a variety of sources and the accuracy of such information cannot be guaranteed. Accordingly, we make no representation, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client or similar relationship. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Do not send us confidential information.
back to top