search   Knowledge Bank printable version
 Knowledge Bank
 Deal Information
 Industry Events
 Advocacy Forums
 Site Utilities
 Free Offers

Click here to
Update Registration

Please be advised that the use of ®
is subject to the
Terms & Conditions

of use and the
Privacy Policy


Best viewed in

Knowledge Bank > Financial > General
Select an area

With Investors Demanding More Personal Attention, CFOs Increase Commitment To Investor Relations
( Greenwich Associates )
(November 27, 2006)

Tuesday, November 27, 2006 Greenwich, CT USA - Due in large part to demands from institutional investors for more face time with company management teams, more than 40% of the corporate chief financial officers participating in a new Greenwich Associates study expect to increase the amount of time spent on investor relations in the coming year.

In April and May of 2006, Greenwich interviewed 91 CFOs at large U.S. corporations. The results of the survey suggest that the typical CFO spends between two and five days per month on IR - a full 60% of the respondents placed themselves in that range.

"Greenwich Associates research among U.S. institutional equity investors suggests that a growing number of institutions are bypassing Wall Street analysts and going directly to the source when evaluating potential investments and monitoring the performance of portfolio companies," says Greenwich Associates consultant Bill Bruno. "As part of this process, institutions are seeking out more frequent one-on-one meetings with top corporate officials - especially the CFO - as an intrinsic and integral part of investor relations. It is in response to these demands that CFOs are upping the proportion of their time spent on investor relations."

Wall Street's New Role: Meeting Planner for IR Teams
Greenwich Associates research reveals several findings indicating the high value that institutions now place on one-on-one meetings with top corporate officials. According to Greenwich Associates' 2006 U.S. Equity Investors Study, of the $4.5 billion in commissions paid out by institutional investors for equity brokerage research/sales coverage and related service from 2005 to 2006, institutions directed roughly 20% to compensate brokers for setting up meetings with company management teams. Among the largest institutions and most active institutional investors, payments to brokers that facilitated direct access to company management made up nearly 30% of total research commission payments.

Over the past several years, institutional investors have internalized the research function and developed in-house capabilities to tackle much of the analysis once considered mainly the domain of Wall Street analysts. With their own research and analytic capacities in place, buy-side organizations have less need for the Street's ideas and recommendations. Rather, they are concentrating on getting in front of corporate management teams to pose their own questions and test their own theories.

"At one point, Wall Street analysts represented the dominant channel for communications between U.S. companies and investors, and their recommendations carried tremendous weight," says Jay Bennett. "Today, there is a widespread belief that the sell-side no longer has quite the same clout to influence the institutional investor base. In part, this is because of consolidation and staffing reductions, as well as the migration of many key analysts to hedge funds or to industry. Hence, CFOs elect to spend more of their time delivering their messages straight to investors."

Despite Wall Street's diminished role in the institutional equity research and investment process, the consultants at Greenwich Associates recommend that CFOs think twice before making any significant reductions to the amount of time or attention paid to sell side analysts. "The typical buy-side analyst is charged with covering more than 50 companies," says Jay Bennett. "Simply collecting the information needed to do a thorough analysis of all these companies is probably a full-time job. When is the analyst supposed to fit in tracking down and setting meetings with management for each of 50 or more companies?"

Rather than trying that experiment, buy-side analysts are outsourcing the logistics of arranging meetings with company management teams to Wall Street. As part of its 2006 Equity Analysts Research Study, Greenwich Associates asked institutional investors to rank their brokers in terms of effectiveness at providing direct access to company management teams. The results: Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch were cited as the firms that delivered the most in terms of face-time with corporate officials.

For more information contact:
Joan Weber
+1 (203) 625 4354

Greenwich Associates is the leading international research-based consulting firm in institutional financial services. Greenwich's studies provide benefits to the buyers and sellers of financial services in the form of benchmark information on best practices and market intelligence on overall trends. Based in Greenwich, Connecticut, with additional offices in London, Toronto, and Tokyo, the firm offers over 100 research-based consulting programs to more than 250 global financial-services companies. Please contact us for further information or to arrange an interview with one of our consultants. You can visit our website,, for more information.



© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising | Site Index | Contact Webmaster

*The site links listed on this web site are for reference use only.
The firm does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or verify the accuracy of the content contained in any of these sites.