search   Knowledge Bank printable version
 Knowledge Bank
 Deal Information
 Industry Events
 Advocacy Forums
 Site Utilities
 Free Offers

Click here to
Update Registration

Please be advised that the use of ®
is subject to the
Terms & Conditions

of use and the
Privacy Policy


Best viewed in

Knowledge Bank > Transactions > Future Flows
Select an area

Special Extended free trial for site members.

Cap charge for EM class drops
Asset Securitization Report--SourceMedia (February 26, 2007)

Felipe Ossa

Standard & Poor's last week cut the capital charge applied to monoline insurers across the ratings board for emerging market future flow transactions. While the move is a positive for originators of future flows, it will doubtfully have much of an impact on monolines' appetite for that asset class, given the number of variables that go into demand, according to industry sources.

"What's changed is how we equate the risk of a transaction with how much a bond insurer sets aside," said Gabriel Wieder, an associate in S&P's emerging markets structured finance group.

The reduced capital charge came in the wake of the agency's introduction of transfer and convertibility assessments in November 2005, an update on the agency's view of the sovereign interference component of future flow transactions. This component factors in capital controls that would block debt payments, among other potential hazards of government intervention.

In gauging the correct capital charge level for a future flow deal, the agency traditionally added the risk of sovereign interference to either the survivability assessment in the case of financial originators or performance risk for exporters. With the ratings folding in an updated view of interference risk, the agency decided it could drop this component in assessing the capital charge, as it was already fully embedded in the rating. "The sovereign interference component that we used to assess had become redundant," Wieder said. With that component gone, the overall capital charge naturally shrank.

While one industry source said the move could nudge up the profitability of a monolines' outstanding future flows book, another said that wasn't necessarily the case. In addition, the charge assessed by Moody's Investors Service hadn't changed, sources said.

What is more, even with S&P's trimmed down capital charge, downgrade risk remains. This is especially compelling in the case of Turkish DPRs, lately the busiest future flow asset class, as S&P by and large rates the deals at the cusp of BBB-'. "Only one notch down and the charges [at monolines] go way up," one source said.

(c) 2007 Asset Securitization Report and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising | Site Index | Contact Webmaster

*The site links listed on this web site are for reference use only.
The firm does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or verify the accuracy of the content contained in any of these sites.