search   Knowledge Bank printable version
 News
 Knowledge Bank
 Deal Information
 International
 Software
 Publications
 Industry Events
 Advocacy Forums
 Links
 Site Utilities
 Contributors
 Free Offers
 Home

Click here to
Update Registration
Information

Please be advised that the use of Securitization.net ®
is subject to the
Terms & Conditions

of use and the
Privacy Policy

Download

Best viewed in

Knowledge Bank > Hedge Funds
Select an area


Free Subscription for site members.

The Growing Hedge Fund Trend That's Fueling Systemic Risk
RiskCenter.com (May 24, 2007)

Location: New York
Author: Lenny Broytman
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's certainly no secret that hedge funds have become a major component of the financial world over the past few years. Experts are saying that since the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) first reported on their effects on systemic financial risk in 2000, they have become even more influential in today's market.

The latest report, which was published on May 19, came at the request of G-7 finance ministers and central bank governors after their meeting in Essen, Germany in February. Although the report did not delve into any investor protection issues, it did focus on issues of systemic and financial stability, which are often posed by hedge funds.

According to an article posted on hedgeworld.com, the latest report found that competition for hedge fund business has become a contributing factor to increasing risk. According to the FSF's findings, declining initial margins are a sign that counterparty discipline is being relaxed.

"These complement other signs of complacency about risks in markets, such as the weakening of covenants in credit contracts, as well as the possible under-pricing of credit, market and liquidity risks," reports the FSF paper. "The materialization of these risks could pose serious challenges for market participants."

The organization maintains that systemic risk can take shape in two different ways. A direct risk can often stem from a counterparty's credit exposure to a hedge fund while an indirect example could be a hedge fund's forced liquidation of a position causing rapid deterioration of market liquidity and prices.

Furthermore, a lot of the aforementioned is often complicated by standardized risk measures and methodologies and the difficulties of aggregating and comparing risk exposures.

The original report, which focused primarily on the effects a potential hedge funds collapse could have on the market as well as other institutions, published several recommendations for investors.

The recommendations (taken from the FSF's website) are as follows:

  • Supervisors should act so that core intermediaries continue to strengthen their counterparty risk management practices.
  • Supervisors should work with core intermediaries to further improve their robustness to the potential erosion of market liquidity.
  • Supervisors should explore and evaluate the extent to which developing more systematic and consistent data on core intermediaries' consolidated counterparty exposures to hedge funds would be an effective complement to existing supervisory efforts.
  • Counterparties and investors should act to strengthen the effectiveness of market discipline, including by obtaining accurate and timely portfolio valuations and risk information.
  • The global hedge fund industry should review and enhance existing sound practice benchmarks for hedge fund managers in the light of expectations for improved practices set out by the official and private sectors.

While the bulk of the report's recommendations mention market supervisors, the FSF still maintains that it favors a principles-based approach to the issue.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article Printed From RiskCenter.com

 

 

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising | Site Index | Contact Webmaster

*The site links listed on this web site are for reference use only.
The firm does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or verify the accuracy of the content contained in any of these sites.