search   Knowledge Bank printable version
 News
 Knowledge Bank
 Deal Information
 International
 Software
 Publications
 Industry Events
 Advocacy Forums
 Links
 Site Utilities
 Contributors
 Free Offers
 Home

Click here to
Update Registration
Information

Please be advised that the use of Securitization.net ®
is subject to the
Terms & Conditions

of use and the
Privacy Policy

Download

Best viewed in

Knowledge Bank > Financial > Banking & Bonds/ Credit & Default Risk
Select an area


FREE Three-week trial of Asset-Backed Alert's newsletter

New Rules Reigniting Covered-Bond Efforts
Asset Backed Alert, Harrison Scott Publications Inc. (April 9, 2010)

Talk has surfaced yet again that U.S. banks are working to issue covered bonds.

The latest indications are that deals could start flowing within the next six months, as Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo and other institutions look for ways to fund their mortgage-lending activities. Those same companies had taken an interest in such transactions after the market for traditional mortgage securitizations fell apart in 2007, but eventually placed those efforts on the back burner.

Now, their attraction to covered bonds is being renewed by concerns that proposed regulations would drive up the costs of issuing mortgage-backed securities. Partly at issue are risk-retention provisions in the financial-reform package introduced by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) last month. Those rules would require banks to keep "skin in the game" by maintaining exposures to structured products they sell. The House passed a similar measure in December.

And on April 7, the SEC approved a rule that that would force operators of registered shelf entities to retain exposures to each class of their securitizations. It's now taking comments on the initiative.

In each case, issuers would lose the ability to gain "true-sale" status for their securitized assets - meaning they would have to hold regulatory capital against them. They've recently let investors know that under such requirements, they might as well arrange their deals as covered bonds. Like mortgage-backed securities, covered bonds are underpinned by pools of home loans. However, the obligations are supported directly by the issuer's creditworthiness and the underlying receivables remain on its balance sheet. "If you're not going to get sale treatment anyway, then a covered bond becomes an alternative," one buysider said.

Meanwhile, a proposed FDIC rule would allow traditional securitizations of mortgages only after the loans have been seasoned about a year. That would further increase funding costs for issuers.

Covered bonds could also get a boost from the United States Covered Bond Act, which Rep. Scott Garrett (D-N.J.) introduced March 18 with co-sponsors Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.) and Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.). The legislation, which has been in the works for some time, would create a legal framework for such deals in the U.S.

Garrett is shooting for June for the House and Senate to vote on his proposal. It contains a measure that would keep funding costs down for covered-bond issuers by capping over-collateralization requirements, along with provisions for the creation of FDIC policies that would insulate collateral from issuer insolvencies. But the banks may move forward regardless of whether it passes.

The thinking is that either one of Dodd's bill or the SEC rule would place securitization costs about on par with those of issuing covered bonds under current law. If both pass, covered bonds would gain a considerable advantage. "If assets are going to be on balance sheet, you'll probably do a covered bond," Morrison & Foerster attorney Jerry Marlatt said. Marlatt is also a member of Sifma's covered-bond council.

While prospective issuers in the U.S. have been concerned that investors at home might find covered bonds unappealing, those worries are fading. Several hedge fund managers have signaled demand for the paper, and interest has been sufficient enough for some foreign issuers to recently place deals in the States. For example, Royal Bank of Canada sold a $1.5 billion transaction to American buyers on April 7. "We've been investors in covered bonds for over a decade," said Cliff Corso, chief executive of MBIA subsidiary Cutwater Asset Management.

The U.S. banks' covered-bond deals would be backed by new jumbo mortgages. While originations in that area have been slow, banks say there are plenty of prospective borrowers they could work with - if they could find a viable financing outlet. "As a potential issuer, our view is that covered bonds provide an attractive, private, stable and diversified funding source," said Brad Brown, a senior vice president in BofA's corporate treasury office.

 

 

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising | Site Index | Contact Webmaster

*The site links listed on this web site are for reference use only.
The firm does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or verify the accuracy of the content contained in any of these sites.