search   Knowledge Bank printable version
 News
 Knowledge Bank
 Deal Information
 International
 Software
 Publications
 Industry Events
 Advocacy Forums
 Links
 Site Utilities
 Contributors
 Free Offers
 Home

Click here to
Update Registration
Information

Please be advised that the use of Securitization.net ®
is subject to the
Terms & Conditions

of use and the
Privacy Policy

Download

Best viewed in

Knowledge Bank > Financial > Banking & Bonds/ Credit & Default Risk
Select an area


Free Subscription for site members.

Basel II's Mission to Make the Banks More Efficient Calls for Leverage Ratio
RiskCenter.com (November 6, 2006)

Location: Washington, D.C.
Author: Ellen J. Silverman
Date: Monday, November 6, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At a recent Senate hearing in Washington, DC, a group of American bank regulators cautioned against the sophisticated methods of Basel II unless they could also preserve a cruder measure of banks' lending exposure, the leverage ratio. Introduced in America in 1991 in the wake of a housing-loans crisis, the leverage ratio ensures that a bank's core capital is at least 3% of its balance sheet, whatever the quality of its loans and its risk-management systems. The leverage ratio could now be exported to other jurisdictions too.

Bank regulators in practically every country have been working on Basel II. They have devised a system for banks in about 100 countries to hold levels of capital that more closely reflect the actual risks borne by the bank in terms of the credit rating of borrowers, the exposure to derivatives and the volatility of securities. At the highest level, banks' home-grown risk calculations are trusted to set the standard. The European Union has gone as far as passing a Capital Requirements Directive which binds banks in member states by law to start complying with its version of Basel II in stages, from January next year. Other places, such as Hong Kong, have written rulebooks that they will also begin implementing from next year.

By contrast, the four main American agencies which supervise banks finally posted a "notice of proposed rule-making" on September 25th. The notice says that Basel II, if and when the American version ever sees daylight, will be applied only to internationally active banks which presently totals 26. All other banks will be regulated by Basel IA, which contains a few elements of Basel II, but retains the leverage ratio. Even the 26 banks readying for Basel II will be forced to cling to the leverage ratio as a safety measure. American banks are annoyed at having their wings clipped in this way and the large European banks are irritated too. First, because any American subsidiary they have will be subject to the same regime. Second, because they have invested millions in a risk-based system that was meant to be applied and harmonized worldwide. The Americans will not introduce their version of Basel II until 2009 at the earliest. Smaller European banks are annoyed because their American equivalents do not have to spend time and money complying with Basel II at all.

American banks with subsidiaries in jurisdictions applying Basel II will have to start complying there which makes reconciliation with the numbers given to their American supervisors quite a challenge. Likewise American supervisors have promised to help their foreign counterparts by inspecting the Basel II risk-calculation models used by foreign banks on their soil.

Since Basel II is being applied in stages anyway, full compliance in the EU is not due until 2008 and any capital reductions have a moving floor over three years. Thus American foot-dragging is not disastrous. Test runs on the possible effects of Basel II have suggested that some banks, particularly American ones, could slash their capital by 31%. That alarmed their regulators since Basel II was meant to reduce some banks' capital cushions only marginally and increase others. But they should console themselves that they have flexibility under Basel II to reward or punish risk-management performance. If they feel banks are letting go of too much capital, there is still plenty that they can do about it without resorting to mistakes of the past.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article Printed From RiskCenter.com

 

 

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising | Site Index | Contact Webmaster

*The site links listed on this web site are for reference use only.
The firm does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or verify the accuracy of the content contained in any of these sites.